±«Óãtv

±«Óãtv the authors: is an Assistant Professor of Social Work at ±«Óãtv University. is a research assistant professor at Wayne State University.

After was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization, the number of cases started to climb globally. It’s difficult to apply a one-size-fits-all interpretation as to why certain states experienced higher numbers of infections while others kept theirs in check.

For instance, in containing the virus was attributed to its stringent lockdown measures, was linked to its well-developed health-care system while was commended for its wide-ranging testing.

In Canada, of the lack of preventative public health policies and the consequential difficulties dealing with the health impacts of the pandemic. Even when wide-scale testing infrastructure was put in place, testing rates .

Read more:

Different degrees of government intervention

Generally speaking, there are three types of among western democracies: social democratic, liberal and conservative or corporatist. These tend to be characterized by various degrees of governmental intervention, universal or selective benefit plans and .

The liberal regimes contain the states of Canada, the United States, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, the only non-western liberal state. The northern European region captures the social democratic states of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland and the Netherlands. And continental Europe includes the so-called called conservative or corporatist states: Italy, Greece, France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Belgium.

On the number of cases per million and the number of deaths per million — the only two variables that can illustrate the divergent testing approaches taken by individual nations — it appears that Canada fares better than the conservative states of continental Europe (Spain, Belgium, Switzerland or Italy) and even better than some social democratic nations (Iceland, Sweden and the Netherlands).

However, when comparing Canada to similar liberal democracies, the country takes third place in relation to the number of cases per million people (2,753). It’s surpassed only by Ireland (5,156), the United Kingdom (4,595) and the U.S. (7,774), and fares well below Australia (307), New Zealand (244) and Japan (148).

This pattern is the same when it comes to the number of deaths per million. With 227 deaths per million, Canada fares better than the U.K. (382), Ireland (351) and the U.S. (382), yet it fares poorly compared to Japan (7.7), New Zealand (4.5) and Australia (4.1).

Canada’s death rate, in fact, is 29 times higher than Japan’s, 50 times higher than New Zealand’s and 55 times higher than Australia’s.

In the U.K., the high number of cases and deaths could be attributed to the to implement lockdown measures and, in the U.S., to how government officials, including President Donald Trump, .

Yet those reasons don’t apply to Canada, where measures were implemented.

In March, Canada to all foreign nationals, and most provinces imposed strict measures.

Rise of neoliberalism at play?

The findings could be interpreted as consequential of the rise of neoliberalism in the country. The last three decades by government cutbacks, decreased public spending, deregulation and policies centred on limited state intervention.

Read more:

The 1996 Canada Health and Social Transfer amalgamated federal funding for health, education and social assistance, to the amount of what was initially allocated to social assistance only.

By 2017, federal cuts to health-care funding had resulted in an estimated .

Such changes for weakening the capacity of the federal government to ensure provinces conform to national principles of adequately providing health care to their citizens.

Take the example of the provincial testing lab in Windsor, Ont., which tested for tuberculosis and the West Nile virus. It was built in 1966, in the golden era of the Canadian welfare state, to service Windsor-Essex in southwestern Ontario.

Despite public outcry, the lab to make way for a new highway. Test samples now have to be shipped to London or Hamilton for analysis. Health experts have pointed out the facility testing for COVID-19, and somewhat redressed the low testing rates in the area. Only 2.5 per cent of the local population in Windsor-Essex had been tested by May 2020.

Long-term care homes at the epicentre

Another possible explanation for the higher mortality and infection rates in Canada rests in long-term residential facilities. ±«Óãtv of Canada’s COVID-19 deaths have been in long-term care homes.

Read more:

A report published by the International Long-Term Care Policy Network found that among 14 countries, . In Australia, a comparable liberal state, the deaths in long-term care homes represented only 25 per cent of the country’s COVID-19 mortality rates.

Canada has a universal health-care system, yet health-care gaps are common. Long-term care, for instance, relies heavily on the to deliver services.

In 1996, the Conservative government requiring a minimum of one registered nurse to be on duty at all times and the allocation of a minimum of 2.25 hours of daily nursing care per resident.

In Ontario in the 1990s, the government of Mike Harris expanded the number of . The staggering amounts of money spent on senior care have been channelled towards private shareholders.

Now Harris is the , one of the province’s largest for-profit senior care providers and a company that has spent on executive compensation and shareholder dividends.

While further research on the relationship between COVID-19 numbers and welfare state systems is needed, it’s clear that Canada must do much more to tackle pandemics now and in the future.