±«Óãtv

Skip to main content

V. Faculty of Graduate Studies

Once the submission is received and all required documentation has been verified, the external reviewer will assess the proposal and write a report.

Faculty of graduate studies approval

This information applies to graduate program proposals only.

For undergraduate proposals, skip to  VI. Senate and External Approvals.

Step 1: External reviewer’s report 

Once the submission is received and all required documentation has been verified, the external reviewer will assess the proposal and write a report. The external reviewer is appointed by the associate dean of the Faculty of Graduate Studies (FGS) from a list of individuals provided by the unit and/or the faculty dean earlier in the proposal development process. 

Step 2: External reviewer’s site visit

For proposals for new programs only, FGS will arrange for the external reviewer to conduct a site visit. 

Step 3: Faculty of Graduate Studies committee approvals 

Once the external reviewer's report is received, the proposal will be considered at the  (login required) and . (login required) 

Please note: Only new programs require FGS Faculty Council approval. APCC is the delegated authority for program modifications. 

  • Verify completeness and clarity of proposals. 
  • Confirm appropriateness and alignment of learning objectives with degree-level expectations and course structure.
  • Ensure proposal takes into consideration impacts on students and other programs.
  • Ensure changes are well-justified from a resource perspective, and recommendations are adequately addressed.
  • Ensure all previous comments and conditions have been addressed. 

Step 4: Recommendation to the Senate Academic Programs and Review Committee (SAPRC) 

If approved by the applicable committees, and pending any suggested modifications, FGS will make a recommendation to the Senate Academic Programs and Review Committee (³§´¡±Ê¸é°ä).